Dj blame game
Even when everything points to a player being the best option on the first line, or the top pairing, or on the penalty kill or in the dying minutes of a game, coaches will insist on rolling out washed up veterans who are very obviously not going to do the job as well as a rookie would. You can certainly find examples of DJ Smith doing this to his players. There are also cases that are a little less clear-cut.
We all remember the first few weeks of the season, when DJ refused to play Brady Tkachuk, Josh Norris and Drake Batherson in important situations and benched them for long periods of time, but he did eventually hand them the reins. DJ at least seems willing to change his opinion on young players, and reward them for really good play. Broadly speaking, it generally refers to set plays and positioning - where the coach wants the players to be on the ice, and what he wants them to do.
In the defensive zone, are players each picking an opposing player to defend against, or are they picking an area of the ice to cover? Who is starting the breakout? Are the forwards in the right place for the breakout? In the offensive zone, how are they keeping the puck in? Are they setting up high danger scoring chances? We saw a good example of it in the Islanders game:. A lot of the defensemen on this team seem inclined to bank the puck off the boards before even attempting a pass, which does not usually yield good results.
Until recently, the whole team was terrible about giving up odd-man rushes, which suggests some issues with their offensive zone strategy. Right now, Smith is getting bad results with a bad group of players. Which players are getting the most ice time and playing in the most high-pressure situations? Fans have been dunking on his defensive usage all season, but according to Natural Stat Trick , the top three defensemen in TOI per game all situations - not just 5v5 are Chabot, Zub and Holden, which is probably how it should be.
Zaitsev is next, which is not good, but when DJ split up Chabot-Zub, he did say it was because all the other pairings were so bad.
I know that sounds like the lowest bar imaginable, but I would like to remind you all of Jared Cowen and Cody Ceci. You know, I really hate this league sometimes. I am not kidding: I am convinced that there are NHL coaches who would put Josh Brown on the first pairing, and keep him there for at least half a season out of pure stubbornness. Paul McLean would do it. Congrats, DJ! I want to end this piece on a slightly depressing note: all coaches are bad.
Most other fanbases complain about their coaches having weird grudges against perfectly good players and overusing big, physical players and never giving rookies a chance to succeed. Bronner, then what? Blaming others for your station in life will indeed make you a victim but the perpetrator will be your own self, not life or those around you.
To ease their conscious they are always blame others, because they don't want to to be accountable of what they are doing. Blaming others makes them feel like they are good people or doing something good. Each time you blame, you sink a little further until you get stuck. But when you stop blaming, then you can act. You can act like people do in fairy tales. You can write your own lines. You can create your own story.
To even attempt to brand and shame whole swathes of people based on their race or gender is, to me, obscene. It has icky echoes of totalitarian propaganda which seeks to direct the ire of a populace at certain sections of society deemed 'unworthy.
I don't understand why people blame other people for what they feel. That is why their problems never go away, and they always have someone or something to blame. Any or no qualification is acceptable. Both genders and all age groups may apply. While no experience is needed, candidate with good blame game skill have an advantage.
Blame game skill is the art of holding someone else responsible for your actions and, especially, for the rot in the society. You have an infinitely long list of co-workers to welcome you into their fold. There is a caveat, though. Successful candidates must be willing to surrender their worth and their dream, as they may conflict with their work schedule.
In the same vein, leaders or would-be leaders need not apply. While no experience is needed, candidates with good blame game skill have an advantage. In the same vein, leaders and would-be leaders need not apply.
Most will either say the problem doesn't exist or blame others for it. Reason being lot people choose to do or say bad things.
0コメント